I think Lanning is the best, No lag, and I get to physically maul people who pwn me!

hey im comenting from my ps3 , who would’ve guessed lol

Any one who believes that psn is better or anywhere near as good as xbl must be very poorly informed, completely biased or extremely dumb. I have just logged onto PSN for the first time in a couple of years expecting a ok experience but not as good as xbl. I am shocked by how poor it is, free or not free. No wonder it is free becuase who in there right mind would pay for that crap. And sony are abou to start charging LOL!

Ppl say explain why XBL is better, it is simply the sum of all parts, not just a healine feature. The best way I can explain is imagine if facebook had the old dis type black screen with green writing but you could still do the same things. It wouldnt be any where as popular as it is. XBL is so easy and fun to be using. PSN feels like it was made in the 90′s. Everything is os hard to find. You can’t even sort all downloads by demos. You cant even delete your pending downloads. The main thing for me is the interface, like i said it is 10 years behing the funcionality of xbl.

It is well documented by all professional journalists that xbl is streets ahead, only ps3 fanboys seem to be blinded.

I think you’re the extremely dumb one. Everything is so hard to find? What the hell is wrong with you? You must be retarded. Yes, you can sort downloads by demos. Yes, you can delete pending demos. Typical idiotic 360 fanboys. They try to justify their money wasting by calling another service, which is very good considering its free, it can do almost everything live can and its free. Seriously, microsoft dont give a toss about xbox, they just use it make money.

Dear Lazygamer please fix ur very not good chat it sucks so bad im gonna break my keyboard and sue u for damages!!!!!!

Dude…Why don’t you use punctuation? :wassat:

writtenpieceswithoutpunctuationisnotaple asuretoreaditreallytakesawayfromthepleas ureofreadingonlysickpyschopathswouldtort ureothersbypostingawalloftextwithoutpunc tuationallhailpunctuationdeathtothosewho donotuseitsosayethbobbykotick

[Edited to stop you breaking the site]

I don’t own either, so I’m not a fanboy.

But let’s be honest, even if they were both free, why would anyone want to play a game online without a dedicated server? Its absurd. How can anything be “competitive” unless there is a neutral host? Game developers do a good job at masking the effects, but the difference is definitely there. A cable connection is nothing in comparison to a 100mbit dedicated line with the processing power to handle multiple gamers. With p2p connections, you are at the behest of annoying siblings downloading torrents, hosts leaving the game, and the host having a HUGE advantage. I just find it almost criminal that Microsoft charges $50 a year without providing dedicated servers. Its such a barbaric way of playing online games – I don’t think the PC has had a p2p game in ten years.

For all those Xbox fanboys:
The whole idea behind Sony announcing the pay-to-play feature for PSN was to introduce a Platinum version of PSN that could be purchased. SOny has specifically stated that what you get for free now will always stay free, and the only thing that you will miss by not paying are the Platinum features. So basically PSN is still better than Xbox Live as it’s stayed free for longer and because Sony is introducing their Platinum version Microsoft will most likely hike up their prices… Just because they can… Have fun with that Xbox people.

P.S. PC’s SUCK and so does Microsoft!