<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Are Treyarch Taking Call of Duty Back to the Past?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.lazygamer.net/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.lazygamer.net/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/</link> <description>The Latest Gaming News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: mankey</title><link>http://www.lazygamer.net/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-48184</link> <dc:creator>mankey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:53:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazygamer.co.za/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/#comment-48184</guid> <description>I think it would be even better if they went further back in history,maybe WWI or american civil war/roman empire thing,could be cool</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be even better if they went further back in history,maybe WWI or american civil war/roman empire thing,could be cool</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RancoR</title><link>http://www.lazygamer.net/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-48183</link> <dc:creator>RancoR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:20:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazygamer.co.za/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/#comment-48183</guid> <description>If this has dedictated server support I will buy it - IWNET is crap, biggest fail ever</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this has dedictated server support I will buy it &#8211; IWNET is crap, biggest fail ever</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Darkling</title><link>http://www.lazygamer.net/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-48055</link> <dc:creator>Darkling</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:22:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazygamer.co.za/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/#comment-48055</guid> <description>Or how aboot the war on underage pregnancy? :face:</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or how aboot the war on underage pregnancy? :face:</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Milesh Bhana ZA</title><link>http://www.lazygamer.net/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-48044</link> <dc:creator>Milesh Bhana ZA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:48:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazygamer.co.za/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/#comment-48044</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know why this is such a big surprise. Wasn&#039;t that the plan? Treyach does Call of Duty (WWII) and Infinity Ward does Modern Warfare. Split franchise and all.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why this is such a big surprise. Wasn&#8217;t that the plan? Treyach does Call of Duty (WWII) and Infinity Ward does Modern Warfare. Split franchise and all.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WeRRieS ZA</title><link>http://www.lazygamer.net/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-48043</link> <dc:creator>WeRRieS ZA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:37:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazygamer.co.za/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/#comment-48043</guid> <description>Call of Duty: Vietnam here we come! :biggrin:  Treyarch = EPIC FAIL!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call of Duty: Vietnam here we come! :biggrin:  Treyarch = EPIC FAIL!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maxiviper</title><link>http://www.lazygamer.net/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-48038</link> <dc:creator>Maxiviper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:49:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazygamer.co.za/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/#comment-48038</guid> <description>What about the cold war or The war on Terror?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the cold war or The war on Terror?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bacon</title><link>http://www.lazygamer.net/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-48030</link> <dc:creator>Bacon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:54:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazygamer.co.za/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/#comment-48030</guid> <description>I wouldn&#039;t mind killing some digital Americans for a change.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind killing some digital Americans for a change.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fred</title><link>http://www.lazygamer.net/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-48029</link> <dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:54:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazygamer.co.za/xbox-360/are-treyarch-taking-call-of-duty-back-to-the-past/#comment-48029</guid> <description>Why not give us Future Warfare !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not give us Future Warfare !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/16 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 384/389 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.lazygamer.net @ 2012-02-12 02:39:19 -->
