Comments on: Warhawk slammed by PSM

By: LazyGamer.co.za » Blog Archive » Ratchet & Clank Future: 93/100

LazyGamer.co.za » Blog Archive » Ratchet & Clank Future: 93/100 — Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:20:11 +0000

[...] when the PSM reviewed Warhawk the fanboys went nuts about the editor being biased and this being an evil plot by Microsoft to [...]

By: LazyGamer.co.za » Blog Archive » Rob Smith goes nuts?

LazyGamer.co.za » Blog Archive » Rob Smith goes nuts? — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 07:55:20 +0000

[...] So this image is meant to be a scan from the latest PSM magazine. With their new editor Rob Smith.. The guy who used to work at OXM and who recently trashed Warhawk. [...]

By: Ruslan

Ruslan — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:28:44 +0000

Err… how can you ever compare Warhawk with Halo 3 puzzles me. They aint even the same type of games.

What surprises me is that its in fact a PS3 website that gives it such an average review. If I am keen on buying a X360 game I would read neutral or X360 related websites for reviews and thus far no PC/X360 gaming website has slapped Bioshock around.

As for ratings, IMO Bioshock 90 ( best single player shooter ), Forza 80, GoW 80 ( +10 if they allow me to download the Annex pack ), Shadowrun 80 ( best online shooter period ).

By: HungryHooligan

HungryHooligan — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:13:50 +0000

Gears 80? Noway son. Sorry there aint better! ever

By: doobiwan

doobiwan — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:30:36 +0000

To be honest, if I was a PS3 owner, I’d still buy it. It’s my type of game and there’s not much else in that space on the PS3 at the moment (or even on the 360). The review also doesn’t slam the game, they called it fun, but limited and slightly flawed.

I think it’s probably a fair indication of where reviews should be, not the insane, over the top 95+ games seem to average these days which makes standing out so much harder.

From the sounds of things, Bioshock should really be about a 90, Forza 2 a 70 and Gears an 80.

Points reviews are flawed.

By: Abe

Abe — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:21:17 +0000

Hmmm, this seems to be in similar vein to that “Fanboi” review of bioshock.
Personally I am disappointed to see this, I have been looking forward to warhawk.
The thing that I am confused about however is that everyone else has been giving warhawk rave reviews, some even saying its good enough to be a HALO 3 beater?
So what gives? Guess we gonna have to wait a bit

By: Ruslan

Ruslan — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:55:01 +0000

Its half a game actually. But I presume its better than nothing seeing 2007 is devoid of killer PS3 apps.

By: HungryHooligan

HungryHooligan — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:34:59 +0000

Scotty do yourself a favour (if you really like gaming), get yourself an xbox, they arn’t that expensive, atleast until sony gets going. You really missing out on alot of great games.

By: LazySAGamer

LazySAGamer — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:26:52 +0000

lol, nice to see you looking on the bright side there scotty

By: scotty777

scotty777 — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:53:22 +0000

SHIT! oh well… at least we getting a game