Its half a game actually. But I presume its better than nothing seeing 2007 is devoid of killer PS3 apps.

To be honest, if I was a PS3 owner, I’d still buy it. It’s my type of game and there’s not much else in that space on the PS3 at the moment (or even on the 360). The review also doesn’t slam the game, they called it fun, but limited and slightly flawed.

I think it’s probably a fair indication of where reviews should be, not the insane, over the top 95+ games seem to average these days which makes standing out so much harder.

From the sounds of things, Bioshock should really be about a 90, Forza 2 a 70 and Gears an 80.

Points reviews are flawed.

Err… how can you ever compare Warhawk with Halo 3 puzzles me. They aint even the same type of games.

What surprises me is that its in fact a PS3 website that gives it such an average review. If I am keen on buying a X360 game I would read neutral or X360 related websites for reviews and thus far no PC/X360 gaming website has slapped Bioshock around.

As for ratings, IMO Bioshock 90 ( best single player shooter ), Forza 80, GoW 80 ( +10 if they allow me to download the Annex pack ), Shadowrun 80 ( best online shooter period ).