This week, we argued that videogames should be taught in schools, because they make you better at
shooting people’s faces off multitasking, thinking about abstract shapes and making rapid decisions. A new study suggests gaming might have a home in medical school too.
Researchers from the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston pit resident medical students against video-game playing 10th graders in a battle to see who could perform virtual, robotic surgery simulation; doing things like suturing wounds. The results?
The gamers did just as well – and in some cases better – at the simulated surgery as the medical residents. Researchers suggest that could be because the unpredictability of gameplay in sports games and shooters is similar to surgery – and the quick-thinking that gaming fosters is a boon. And while it means all those hours on the PlayStation aren’t a waste of time, it doesn’t mean you should give up medical school to play games.
“I’m not encouraging [teenagers] to spend countless hours in front of the computer games,” says lead researcher Sam Kilic,"because our job is not to create the best surgeon ever or the best soldier ever … in this age group. They have to have the fundamental human being skills in their developing age.”
I already know that I’d be a great surgeon; I’ve poured countless hours in to the very realistic surgery simulator Trauma Centre on the Nintendo DS – and that’s all the training anybody really needs.
In this article
I'm old, grumpy and more than just a little cynical. One day, I found myself in possession of a NES, and a copy of Super Mario Bros 3. It was that game that made me realise that games were more than just toys to idly while away time - they were capable of being masterpieces. I'm here now, looking for more of those masterpieces. I am also the emperor of the backend