It’s not just about sex in Dragon Age: Inquisition 
  TweetTweet

Zoe Hawkins
August 20, 2014 at 7:00 pm

Dragon age sex

Bioware games have had all kinds of weird and wonderful romance options – the sex scenes certainly looked odd, but it was all about getting that paramour achievement. In the new Dragon Age, they took a more organic approach to romance that sounds really impressive.

In an interview with IGN, Creative Director Mike Laidlaw explained that it’s about more than just the sex:

The most romantic moment in a video game that I’ve ever seen is when Jackie visits his girlfriend’s apartment in The Darkness…. She baked me a cake, she’s moving in, and you watch possibly the entirety of To Kill a Mockingbird as she passes out on your lap because she’s tired and snuggly. That is amazing.

Laidlaw goes on to say that it’s the closest video games get to the first 10 minutes of Up and that it makes players really care about the character. He also sites The Last of Us as an example of gaming that makes you care about characters; the goal in Dragon Age: Inquisition wasn’t just to give enough presents until someone wanted to have sex with the player, it’s more about letting genuine affections grow and develop. While some characters might be romantically off-limits or just friends and others might not share your sexual orientation, the idea is for specific moments to act as beats in the game, times when characters might wake up to desires or realize that there are incompatibilities.

It sounds like the game is coming along nicely and I loved my hands on time with it. The romance system has always been flawed in games, but this one is shaping up to be quite something. I’m really excited for it – it feels like the attention to detail is impressive in this latest RPG from Bioware.

Wielding my lasso of truth, I am the combination of nerd passion and grammar nazi. I delve into all things awesome and geek-tastic. I believe people should stop defining themselves and just enjoy playing games, so let's get on with it!

  • Rags

    It’s about sex with too much clothes on.

  • Jim Lenoir (Banana Jim)

    It’s not really sex, is it? More like awkward heavy petting and clothes on grinding. Which is actually a lot more disturbing than anything CD Projekt could conjure up in the Witcher.

  • Alien Emperor Trevor

    You don’t just give people presents until they have sex with you? What madness is this? It’s like everything I learnt about social interaction from games has been wrong all this time.

  • MichaelMatusowsky

    It’s always about sex. That’s what our species is all about. sex sex sex.

    • ToshZA

      You have to admit – sex is fun.

  • Hammersteyn

    Watch a random American sue the game for not promoting safe sex when he picks up an STD

  • Sir Rants A Lot: On Pandora

    You loved your “hands on” on the game? While writing about the sex? Huehuehue [juvenile laughter]

  • Kromas of City17

    I am sorry but for some people giving enough presents to get laid is a REAL romantic option. Still seeking a sugar momma of my own. :P

  • WarframedSquirrel

    All the foreverSP people can finally find out what it’s like to cuddle with others.

    • Errol The Terrible

      “the others”? You mean “cuddle with all the other foreverSP”?

      • WarframedSquirrel

        Or themselves, the voices in their heads, or their blow-up-dolls… up to them :P

  • ronrsargen

    s­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­?­­­­­­­­­r­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­ ?or­­­­­­­­­king ?­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­ home ?it­­­­­­­­­h Google! It­­­­­­­­­’s­­­­­­­­­ by-f?­­­­­­­­­r­­­­­­­­­ t­­­­­­­­­he bes­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­ job I’ve h?­­­­­­­­­d. L?­­­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­ ?ednes­­­­­­­­­d?­­­­­­­­­y I got­­­­­­­­­ ?­­­­­­­­­ br­­­­­­­­­?­­­­­­­­­nd ne? BM? s­­­­­­­­­ince get­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­ing ?­­­­­­­­­ check for­­­­­­­­­ $6474 t­­­­­­­­­his­­­­­­­­­ – 4 ?eeks­­­­­­­­­ p?­­­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­. I beg?­­­­­­­­­n t­­­­­­­­­his­­­­­­­­­ 8-mont­­­­­­­­­hs­­­­­­­­­ ?­­­­­­­­­go ?­­­­­­­­­nd immedi?­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­ely ??­­­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­­­ br­­­­­­­­­inging home ?­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­ le?­­­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­ $77 per­­­­­­­­­ hour­­­­­­­­­. I ?or­­­­­­­­­k t­­­­­­­­­hr­­­­­­­­­ough t­­­­­­­­­his­­­­­­­­­ link, go? t­­­­­­­­­o t­­­­­­­­­ech t­­­­­­­­­?­­­­­­­­­b for­­­­­­­­­ ?or­­­­­­­­­k det­­­­­­­­­?­­­­­­­­­il

    >>>>>>>>>> http://www.more-moneypeg.com

    ======================